Evolution

Un article de Vev.

Modèle:Pp-semi-vandalism Modèle:Featured article Modèle:Otheruses4 Modèle:Redirect Modèle:Seeintro Modèle:Evolution3 In biology, evolution is a change in the inherited traits of a population from one generation to the next. These traits are the expression of genes that are copied and passed on to offspring during reproduction. Mutations in these genes can produce new or altered traits, resulting in heritable differences between organisms. New traits can also come from transfer of genes between populations, as in migration, or between species, in horizontal gene transfer. Scientists theorize that evolution occurs when these heritable differences become more common or rare in a population, either non-randomly through natural selection or randomly through genetic drift.

www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/suppl_1/8567}}</ref> In contrast, genetic drift produces random changes in the frequency of traits in a population. Genetic drift arises from the role chance plays in whether a given individual will survive and reproduce.//www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/suppl_1/8567}}</ref> In contrast, genetic drift produces random changes in the frequency of traits in a population. Genetic drift arises from the role chance plays in whether a given individual will survive and reproduce.

One definition of a species is a group of organisms that can reproduce with one another and produce fertile offspring. However, when a species is separated into populations that are prevented from interbreeding, mutations, genetic drift, and the selection of novel traits cause the accumulation of differences over generations and the emergence of new species.<ref>Modèle:Wikiref</ref> The similarities between organisms suggest that all known species are descended from a common ancestor (or ancestral gene pool) through this process of gradual divergence.<ref name=Futuyma>Modèle:Cite book</ref>

darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F373&viewtype=text&pageseq=16}}. Related earlier ideas were acknowledged in Modèle:Cite book</ref> It encountered initial resistance from religious authorities who believed humans were divinely set apart from the animal kingdom. In the 1930s, Darwinian natural selection was combined with Mendelian inheritance to form the modern evolutionary synthesis,<ref name=Kutschera/> in which the connection between the units of evolution (genes) and the mechanism of evolution (natural selection) was made. This powerful explanatory and predictive theory has become the central organizing principle of modern biology, providing a unifying explanation for the diversity of life on Earth.<ref> IAP Statement on the Teaching of Evolution

. The Interacademy Panel on International Issues 
 
 (2006)
   

. Retrieved on 2007-04-25. — Statement on the Teaching of Evolution

. American Association for the Advancement of Science 
 
 (2006)
   

. Retrieved on 2007-04-25. </ref>//darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F373&viewtype=text&pageseq=16}}. Related earlier ideas were acknowledged in Modèle:Cite book</ref> It encountered initial resistance from religious authorities who believed humans were divinely set apart from the animal kingdom. In the 1930s, Darwinian natural selection was combined with Mendelian inheritance to form the modern evolutionary synthesis,<ref name=Kutschera/> in which the connection between the units of evolution (genes) and the mechanism of evolution (natural selection) was made. This powerful explanatory and predictive theory has become the central organizing principle of modern biology, providing a unifying explanation for the diversity of life on Earth.<ref> IAP Statement on the Teaching of Evolution

. The Interacademy Panel on International Issues 
 
 (2006)
   

. Retrieved on 2007-04-25. — Statement on the Teaching of Evolution

. American Association for the Advancement of Science 
 
 (2006)
   

. Retrieved on 2007-04-25. </ref>

Heredity

Modèle:Details more

Inheritance in organisms occurs through discrete traits – particular characteristics of an organism. In humans, for example, eye color is an inherited characteristic, which individuals can inherit from one of their parents.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Inherited traits are controlled by genes and the complete set of genes within an organism's genome is called its genotype.<ref name=Pearson_2006>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

The complete set of observable traits that make up the structure and behavior of an organism is called its phenotype. These traits come from the interaction of its genotype with the environment.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> As a result, not every aspect of an organism's phenotype is inherited. Suntanned skin results from the interaction between a person's genotype and sunlight; thus, a suntan is not hereditary. However, people have different responses to sunlight, arising from differences in their genotype; a striking example is individuals with the inherited trait of albinism, who do not tan and are highly sensitive to sunburn.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Genes are regions within DNA molecules that contain genetic information.<ref name=Pearson_2006/> DNA is a long molecule with four types of bases attached along its length. Different genes have different sequences of bases; it is the sequence of these bases that encodes genetic information. Within cells, the long strands of DNA associate with proteins to form structures called chromosomes. A specific location within a chromosome is known as a locus. If the DNA sequence at a locus varies between individuals, the different forms of this sequence are called alleles. DNA sequences can change through mutations, producing new alleles. If a mutation occurs within a gene, the new allele may affect the trait that the gene controls, altering the phenotype of the organism. However, while this simple correspondence between an allele and a trait works in some cases, most traits are more complex and are controlled by multiple interacting genes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref><ref name=Lin>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Variation

Modèle:Details more www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=9533122}}</ref>//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=9533122}}</ref>

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=9533123}}</ref> However, even relatively small changes in genotype can lead to dramatic changes in phenotype: chimpanzees and humans differ in only about 5% of their genomes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=9533123}}</ref> However, even relatively small changes in genotype can lead to dramatic changes in phenotype: chimpanzees and humans differ in only about 5% of their genomes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Mutation

Modèle:Details more www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/16/6504}}</ref> Due to the damaging effects that mutations can have on cells, organisms have evolved mechanisms such as DNA repair to remove mutations.<ref name=Bertram/> Therefore, the optimal mutation rate for a species is a trade-off between short-term costs, such as the risk of cancer, and the long-term benefits of advantageous mutations.<ref name=Sniegowski>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/16/6504}}</ref> Due to the damaging effects that mutations can have on cells, organisms have evolved mechanisms such as DNA repair to remove mutations.<ref name=Bertram/> Therefore, the optimal mutation rate for a species is a trade-off between short-term costs, such as the risk of cancer, and the long-term benefits of advantageous mutations.<ref name=Sniegowski>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

www.genome.org/cgi/content/full/9/4/317 |journal=Genome Res. |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=317–24 |year=1999 |pmid=10207154}}</ref>//www.genome.org/cgi/content/full/9/4/317 |journal=Genome Res. |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=317–24 |year=1999 |pmid=10207154}}</ref>

www.genome.org/cgi/content/full/14/5/845 |journal=Genome Res. |volume=14 |issue=5 |pages=845–51 |year=2004 |pmid=15123584}}</ref> The completion of both the human genome project and the chimpanzee genome project has allowed the identification of the relevant chromosomes. In evolution, the most important role of such chromosomal rearrangements may be to accelerate the divergence of a population into new species by preserving genetic differences within populations.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.genome.org/cgi/content/full/14/5/845 |journal=Genome Res. |volume=14 |issue=5 |pages=845–51 |year=2004 |pmid=15123584}}</ref> The completion of both the human genome project and the chimpanzee genome project has allowed the identification of the relevant chromosomes. In evolution, the most important role of such chromosomal rearrangements may be to accelerate the divergence of a population into new species by preserving genetic differences within populations.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Sequences of DNA that can move about the genome, such as transposons, make up a major fraction of the genetic material of plants and animals, and may have been important in the evolution of genomes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> For example, more than a million copies of the Alu sequence are present in the human genome, and these sequences have now been recruited to perform functions such as regulating gene expression.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Another effect of these mobile DNA sequences is that when they move within a genome, they can mutate or delete existing genes and thereby produce genetic diversity.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Recombination

Modèle:Details more www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=10677316 |journal=Am. J. Hum. Genet. |volume=66 |issue=2 |pages=557–66 |year=2000 |pmid=10677316}}</ref> This tendency is measured by finding how often two alleles occur together, which is called their linkage disequilibrium. A set of alleles that is usually inherited in a group is called a haplotype, and this co-inheritance can indicate that the locus is under positive selection (see below).<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=10677316 |journal=Am. J. Hum. Genet. |volume=66 |issue=2 |pages=557–66 |year=2000 |pmid=10677316}}</ref> This tendency is measured by finding how often two alleles occur together, which is called their linkage disequilibrium. A set of alleles that is usually inherited in a group is called a haplotype, and this co-inheritance can indicate that the locus is under positive selection (see below).<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12871918 |journal=Genetics |volume=164 |issue=3 |pages=1099–118 |year=2003 |pmid=12871918}}</ref> Consequently, when alleles cannot be separated by recombination – such as in mammalian Y chromosomes, which pass intact from fathers to sons – harmful mutations accumulate.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> In addition, recombination can produce individuals with new and advantageous gene combinations. These positive effects of recombination are balanced by the fact that this process can cause mutations and separate beneficial combinations of genes.<ref name=Otto/> The optimal rate of recombination for a species is therefore a trade-off between conflicting factors.//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12871918 |journal=Genetics |volume=164 |issue=3 |pages=1099–118 |year=2003 |pmid=12871918}}</ref> Consequently, when alleles cannot be separated by recombination – such as in mammalian Y chromosomes, which pass intact from fathers to sons – harmful mutations accumulate.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> In addition, recombination can produce individuals with new and advantageous gene combinations. These positive effects of recombination are balanced by the fact that this process can cause mutations and separate beneficial combinations of genes.<ref name=Otto/> The optimal rate of recombination for a species is therefore a trade-off between conflicting factors.

Mechanisms

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12807795 |journal=Genetics |volume=164 |issue=2 |pages=767–79 |year=2003 |pmid=12807795}}</ref> Natural selection usually predominates in large populations, while genetic drift dominates in small populations. The dominance of genetic drift in small populations can even lead to the fixation of slightly deleterious mutations.<ref name=Ohta>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> As a result, changing population size can dramatically influence the course of evolution. Population bottlenecks, where the population shrinks temporarily and therefore loses genetic variation, result in a more uniform population.<ref name=Amos/> Bottlenecks also result from alterations in gene flow such as decreased migration, expansions into new habitats, or population subdivision.<ref name=Whitlock/>//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12807795 |journal=Genetics |volume=164 |issue=2 |pages=767–79 |year=2003 |pmid=12807795}}</ref> Natural selection usually predominates in large populations, while genetic drift dominates in small populations. The dominance of genetic drift in small populations can even lead to the fixation of slightly deleterious mutations.<ref name=Ohta>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> As a result, changing population size can dramatically influence the course of evolution. Population bottlenecks, where the population shrinks temporarily and therefore loses genetic variation, result in a more uniform population.<ref name=Amos/> Bottlenecks also result from alterations in gene flow such as decreased migration, expansions into new habitats, or population subdivision.<ref name=Whitlock/>

Natural selection

Modèle:Details more

Natural selection is the process by which genetic mutations that enhance reproduction become, and remain, more common in successive generations of a population. It has often been called a "self-evident" mechanism because it necessarily follows from three simple facts:

• Heritable variation exists within populations of organisms.
• Organisms produce more offspring than can survive.
• These offspring vary in their ability to survive and reproduce.

These conditions produce competition between organisms for survival and reproduction. Consequently, organisms with traits that give them an advantage over their competitors pass these advantageous traits on, while traits that do not confer an advantage are not passed on to the next generation.

The central concept of natural selection is the evolutionary fitness of an organism. This measures the organism's genetic contribution to the next generation. However, this is not the same as the total number of offspring: instead fitness measures the proportion of subsequent generations that carry an organism's genes.<ref name=Haldane>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Consequently, if an allele increases fitness more than the other alleles of that gene, then with each generation this allele will become more common within the population. These traits are said to be "selected for". Examples of traits that can increase fitness are enhanced survival, and increased fecundity. Conversely, the lower fitness caused by having a less beneficial or deleterious allele results in this allele becoming rarer — they are "selected against".<ref name=Lande/> Importantly, the fitness of an allele is not a fixed characteristic, if the environment changes, previously neutral or harmful traits may become beneficial and previously beneficial traits become harmful.<ref name="Futuyma"/>.

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=11470913 |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=98 |issue=16 |pages=9157–60 |year=2001 |pmid=11470913}}</ref> Secondly, disruptive selection is selection for extreme trait values and often results in two different values becoming most common, with selection against the average value. This would be when either short or tall organisms had an advantage, but not those of medium height. Finally, in stabilizing selection there is selection against extreme trait values on both ends, which causes a decrease in variance around the average value.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> This would, for example, cause organisms to slowly become all the same height.//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=11470913 |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=98 |issue=16 |pages=9157–60 |year=2001 |pmid=11470913}}</ref> Secondly, disruptive selection is selection for extreme trait values and often results in two different values becoming most common, with selection against the average value. This would be when either short or tall organisms had an advantage, but not those of medium height. Finally, in stabilizing selection there is selection against extreme trait values on both ends, which causes a decrease in variance around the average value.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> This would, for example, cause organisms to slowly become all the same height.

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1691039&blobtype=pdf |journal=Proc. Biol. Sci. |volume=269 |issue=1498 |pages=1331–40 |year=2002 |pmid=12079655}}</ref> This survival disadvantage is balanced by higher reproductive success in males that show these hard to fake, sexually selected traits.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1691039&blobtype=pdf |journal=Proc. Biol. Sci. |volume=269 |issue=1498 |pages=1331–40 |year=2002 |pmid=12079655}}</ref> This survival disadvantage is balanced by higher reproductive success in males that show these hard to fake, sexually selected traits.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=9533127 |journal=Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. |volume=353 |issue=1366 |pages=307–14 |year=1998 |pmid=9533127}}</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> None of these models are mutually-exclusive and selection may act on multiple levels simultaneously.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Below the level of the individual, genes called transposons try to copy themselves throughout the genome.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Selection at a level above the individual, such as group selection, may allow the evolution of co-operation, as discussed below.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=9533127 |journal=Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. |volume=353 |issue=1366 |pages=307–14 |year=1998 |pmid=9533127}}</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> None of these models are mutually-exclusive and selection may act on multiple levels simultaneously.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Below the level of the individual, genes called transposons try to copy themselves throughout the genome.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Selection at a level above the individual, such as group selection, may allow the evolution of co-operation, as discussed below.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Genetic drift

Modèle:Details more

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=9178020 |journal=Genetics |volume=146 |issue=2 |pages=723–33 |year=1997 |pmid=9178020}}</ref>//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=9178020 |journal=Genetics |volume=146 |issue=2 |pages=723–33 |year=1997 |pmid=9178020}}</ref>

mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/22/12/2318 |journal=Mol. Biol. Evol. |volume=22 |issue=12 |pages=2318–42 |year=2005 |pmid=16120807}}</ref> These investigations were prompted by the neutral theory of molecular evolution, which proposed that most evolutionary changes are the result of the fixation of neutral mutations that do not have any immediate effects on the fitness of an organism.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Hence, in this model, most genetic changes in a population are the result of constant mutation pressure and genetic drift.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/22/12/2318 |journal=Mol. Biol. Evol. |volume=22 |issue=12 |pages=2318–42 |year=2005 |pmid=16120807}}</ref> These investigations were prompted by the neutral theory of molecular evolution, which proposed that most evolutionary changes are the result of the fixation of neutral mutations that do not have any immediate effects on the fitness of an organism.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Hence, in this model, most genetic changes in a population are the result of constant mutation pressure and genetic drift.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Gene flow

Modèle:Details more

Gene flow is the exchange of genes between populations, which are usually of the same species.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Examples of gene flow within a species include the migration and then breeding of organisms, or the exchange of pollen. Gene transfer between species includes the formation of hybrid organisms and horizontal gene transfer.

Migration into or out of a population can change allele frequencies. Immigration may add new genetic material to the established gene pool of a population. Conversely, emigration may remove genetic material. As barriers to reproduction between two diverging populations are required for the populations to become new species, gene flow may slow this process by spreading genetic differences between the populations. Gene flow is hindered by mountain ranges, oceans and deserts or even man-made structures such as the Great Wall of China, which has hindered the flow of plant genes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

jhered.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/96/3/241 |journal=J. Hered. |volume=96 |issue=3 |pages=241–52 |year=2005 |pmid=15618301}}</ref> The importance of hybridization in creating new species of animals is unclear, although cases have been seen in many types of animals,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> with the gray tree frog being a particularly well-studied example.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//jhered.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/96/3/241 |journal=J. Hered. |volume=96 |issue=3 |pages=241–52 |year=2005 |pmid=15618301}}</ref> The importance of hybridization in creating new species of animals is unclear, although cases have been seen in many types of animals,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> with the gray tree frog being a particularly well-studied example.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=10860970 |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=97 |issue=13 |pages=7051–57 |year=2000 |pmid=10860970}}</ref>//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=10860970 |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=97 |issue=13 |pages=7051–57 |year=2000 |pmid=10860970}}</ref>

arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.genet.37.050503.084247 |journal=Annu Rev Genet |volume=37 |pages=283–328 |year=2003 |pmid=14616063}}</ref> In medicine, this contributes to the spread of antibiotic resistance, as when one bacteria acquires resistance genes it can rapidly transfer them to other species.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Horizontal transfer of genes from bacteria to eukaryotes such as the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the adzuki bean beetle Callosobruchus chinensis may also have occurred.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Viruses can also carry DNA between organisms, allowing transfer of genes even across biological domains.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Gene transfer has also occurred within eukaryotic cells, from the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes to nuclear genomes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.genet.37.050503.084247 |journal=Annu Rev Genet |volume=37 |pages=283–328 |year=2003 |pmid=14616063}}</ref> In medicine, this contributes to the spread of antibiotic resistance, as when one bacteria acquires resistance genes it can rapidly transfer them to other species.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Horizontal transfer of genes from bacteria to eukaryotes such as the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the adzuki bean beetle Callosobruchus chinensis may also have occurred.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Viruses can also carry DNA between organisms, allowing transfer of genes even across biological domains.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Gene transfer has also occurred within eukaryotic cells, from the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes to nuclear genomes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Outcomes

Evolution influences every aspect of the form and behavior of organisms. Most prominent are the specific behavioral and physical adaptations that are the outcome of natural selection. These adaptations increase fitness by aiding activities such as finding food, avoiding predators or attracting mates. Organisms can also respond to selection by co-operating with each other, usually by aiding their relatives or engaging in mutually-beneficial symbiosis. In the longer term, evolution produces new species through splitting ancestral populations of organisms into new groups that are unable to breed with one another.

These outcomes of evolution are sometimes divided into macroevolution, which is evolution that occurs at or above the level of species, such as speciation, and microevolution, which is smaller evolutionary changes, such as adaptations, within a species or population. In general, macroevolution is the outcome of long periods of microevolution.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Thus, the distinction between micro- and macroevolution is not a fundamental one - the difference is simply the time involved.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> However, in macroevolution, the traits of the entire species are important. For instance, a large amount of variation among individuals allows a species to rapidly adapt to new habitats, lessening the chance of it going extinct, while a wide geographic range increases the chance of speciation, by making it more likely that part of the population will become isolated. In this sense, microevolution and macroevolution can sometimes be separate.<ref>Modèle:Wikiref</ref>

www.sciam.com/askexpert_question.cfm?articleID=00071863-683B-1C72-9EB7809EC588F2D7 Scientific American; Biology: Is the human race evolving or devolving?], see also biological devolution.</ref> Although complex species have evolved, this occurs as a side effect of the overall number of organisms increasing, and simple forms of life remain more common.<ref name=Carroll>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> For example, the overwhelming majority of species are microscopic prokaryotes, which form about half the world's biomass despite their small size,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and constitute the vast majority of Earth's biodiversity.<ref name=Schloss>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Simple organisms therefore remain the dominant form of life on Earth, and complex life appears more diverse only because it is more noticeable.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.sciam.com/askexpert_question.cfm?articleID=00071863-683B-1C72-9EB7809EC588F2D7 Scientific American; Biology: Is the human race evolving or devolving?], see also biological devolution.</ref> Although complex species have evolved, this occurs as a side effect of the overall number of organisms increasing, and simple forms of life remain more common.<ref name=Carroll>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> For example, the overwhelming majority of species are microscopic prokaryotes, which form about half the world's biomass despite their small size,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and constitute the vast majority of Earth's biodiversity.<ref name=Schloss>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Simple organisms therefore remain the dominant form of life on Earth, and complex life appears more diverse only because it is more noticeable.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Adaptation

Modèle:Details www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/mandi/46/6/46_391/_article/-char/en |journal=Microbiol. Immunol. |volume=46 |issue=6 |pages=391–95 |year=2002 |pmid=12153116}}</ref> However, many traits that appear to be simple adaptations are in fact exaptations: structures originally adapted for one function, but which coincidentally became somewhat useful for some other function in the process.<ref name=GouldStructP1235>Modèle:Wikiref </ref> One example is the African lizard Holapsis guentheri, which developed an extremely flat head for hiding in crevices, as can be seen by looking at its near relatives. However, in this species, the head has become so flattened that it assists in gliding from tree to tree - an exaptation.<ref name=GouldStructP1235/>//www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/mandi/46/6/46_391/_article/-char/en |journal=Microbiol. Immunol. |volume=46 |issue=6 |pages=391–95 |year=2002 |pmid=12153116}}</ref> However, many traits that appear to be simple adaptations are in fact exaptations: structures originally adapted for one function, but which coincidentally became somewhat useful for some other function in the process.<ref name=GouldStructP1235>Modèle:Wikiref </ref> One example is the African lizard Holapsis guentheri, which developed an extremely flat head for hiding in crevices, as can be seen by looking at its near relatives. However, in this species, the head has become so flattened that it assists in gliding from tree to tree - an exaptation.<ref name=GouldStructP1235/>

www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/103/2/379 |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=103 |issue=2 |pages=379–82 |year=2006 |pmid=16387860}}</ref>//www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/103/2/379 |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=103 |issue=2 |pages=379–82 |year=2006 |pmid=16387860}}</ref>

links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0066-4162%281995%2926%3C249%3AVALONC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2 |journal=Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. |volume=26 |pages=249–68 |year=1995 |doi=10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.001341}}</ref> Such structures may have little or no function in a current species, yet have a clear function in ancestral species, or other closely-related species. Examples include the non-functional remains of eyes in blind cave-dwelling fish,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> wings in flightless birds,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and the presence of hip bones in whales and snakes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Examples of vestigial structures in humans include wisdom teeth,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> the coccyx,<ref name=Fong/> and the vermiform appendix.<ref name=Fong/>//links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0066-4162%281995%2926%3C249%3AVALONC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2 |journal=Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. |volume=26 |pages=249–68 |year=1995 |doi=10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.001341}}</ref> Such structures may have little or no function in a current species, yet have a clear function in ancestral species, or other closely-related species. Examples include the non-functional remains of eyes in blind cave-dwelling fish,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> wings in flightless birds,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and the presence of hip bones in whales and snakes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Examples of vestigial structures in humans include wisdom teeth,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> the coccyx,<ref name=Fong/> and the vermiform appendix.<ref name=Fong/>

www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=14756346 |journal=Int. J. Dev. Biol. |volume=47 |issue=7–8 |pages=705–13 |year=2003 |pmid=14756346}}
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> These studies have shown that evolution can alter development to create new structures, such as embryonic bone structures that develop into the jaw in other animals instead forming part of the middle ear in mammals.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> It is also possible for structures that have been lost in evolution to reappear due to changes in developmental genes, such as a mutation in chickens causing embryos to grow teeth similar to those of crocodiles.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/paper.php?doi=14756346 |journal=Int. J. Dev. Biol. |volume=47 |issue=7–8 |pages=705–13 |year=2003 |pmid=14756346}}
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> These studies have shown that evolution can alter development to create new structures, such as embryonic bone structures that develop into the jaw in other animals instead forming part of the middle ear in mammals.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> It is also possible for structures that have been lost in evolution to reappear due to changes in developmental genes, such as a mutation in chickens causing embryos to grow teeth similar to those of crocodiles.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Co-evolution

Modèle:Details more Interactions between organisms can produce both conflict and co-operation. When the interaction is between pairs of species, such as a pathogen and a host, or a predator and its prey, these species can develop matched sets of adaptations. Here, the evolution of one species causes adaptations in a second species. These changes in the second species then, in turn, cause new adaptations in the first species. This cycle of selection and response is called co-evolution.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> An example is the production of tetrodotoxin in the rough-skinned newt and the evolution of tetrodotoxin resistance in its predator, the common garter snake. In this predator-prey pair, an evolutionary arms race has produced high levels of toxin in the newt and correspondingly high levels of resistance in the snake.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Co-operation

Modèle:Details more However, not all interactions between species involve conflict.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Many cases of mutually beneficial interactions have evolved. For instance, an extreme cooperation exists between plants and the mycorrhizal fungi that grow on their roots and aid the plant in absorbing nutrients from the soil.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> This is a reciprocal relationship as the plants provide the fungi with sugars from photosynthesis. Here, the fungi actually grow inside plant cells, allowing them to exchange nutrients with their hosts, while sending signals that suppress the plant immune system.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Coalitions between organisms of the same species have also evolved. An extreme case is the Eusociality found in social insects, such as bees, termites and ants, where sterile insects feed and guard the small number of organisms in a colony that are able to reproduce. On an even smaller scale, the somatic cells that make up the body of an animal are limited in their capacity to reproduce in order to maintain a stable organism which then supports a small number of the animal's germ cells to produce offspring. Here, somatic cells respond to specific signals that instruct them to either grow or kill themselves. If cells ignore these signals and attempt to multiply inappropriately, their uncontrolled growth causes cancer.<ref name=Bertram/>

www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/23/9736 |journal=Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. |volume=104 |issue=23 |pages=9736–40 |year=2007 |pmid=17517608}}</ref> This activity is selected for because if the helping individual contains alleles which promote the helping activity, it is likely that its kin will also contain these alleles and thus those alleles will be passed on.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Other processes that may promote cooperation include group selection, where cooperation provides benefits to a group of organisms.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/23/9736 |journal=Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. |volume=104 |issue=23 |pages=9736–40 |year=2007 |pmid=17517608}}</ref> This activity is selected for because if the helping individual contains alleles which promote the helping activity, it is likely that its kin will also contain these alleles and thus those alleles will be passed on.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Other processes that may promote cooperation include group selection, where cooperation provides benefits to a group of organisms.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Speciation

Modèle:Details more

www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html|title=Observed Instances of Speciation|publisher=The TalkOrigins Archive|accessdate=2007-05-10}}
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> In sexually-reproducing organisms, speciation results from reproductive isolation followed by genealogical divergence. There are four mechanisms for speciation. The most common in animals is allopatric speciation, which occurs in populations initially isolated geographically, such as by habitat fragmentation or migration. As selection and drift act independently in isolated populations, separation will eventually produce organisms that cannot interbreed.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html|title=Observed Instances of Speciation|publisher=The TalkOrigins Archive|accessdate=2007-05-10}}
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> In sexually-reproducing organisms, speciation results from reproductive isolation followed by genealogical divergence. There are four mechanisms for speciation. The most common in animals is allopatric speciation, which occurs in populations initially isolated geographically, such as by habitat fragmentation or migration. As selection and drift act independently in isolated populations, separation will eventually produce organisms that cannot interbreed.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

www.genetics.org/cgi/reprint/94/4/1011 |journal=Genetics |volume=94 |issue=4 |pages=1011–38 |year=1980 |pmid=6777243}}</ref>//www.genetics.org/cgi/reprint/94/4/1011 |journal=Genetics |volume=94 |issue=4 |pages=1011–38 |year=1980 |pmid=6777243}}</ref>

www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v97/n1/full/6800835a.html}}</ref> Here, plants evolve that have resistance to high levels of metals in the soil. Selection against interbreeding with the metal-sensitive parental population produces a change in flowering time of the metal-resistant plants, causing reproductive isolation. Selection against hybrids between the two populations may cause reinforcement, which is the evolution of traits that promote mating within a species, as well as character displacement, which is when two species become more distinct in appearance.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v97/n1/full/6800835a.html}}</ref> Here, plants evolve that have resistance to high levels of metals in the soil. Selection against interbreeding with the metal-sensitive parental population produces a change in flowering time of the metal-resistant plants, causing reproductive isolation. Selection against hybrids between the two populations may cause reinforcement, which is the evolution of traits that promote mating within a species, as well as character displacement, which is when two species become more distinct in appearance.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Finally, in sympatric speciation species diverge without geographic isolation or changes in habitat. This form is rare since even a small amount of gene flow may remove genetic differences between parts of a population.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Generally, sympatric speciation in animals requires the evolution of both genetic differences and non-random mating, to allow reproductive isolation to evolve.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

One type of sympatric speciation involves cross-breeding of two related species to produce a new hybrid species. This is not common in animals as animal hybrids are usually sterile, because during meiosis the homologous chromosomes from each parent, being from different species cannot successfully pair. It is more common in plants, however because plants often double their number of chromosomes, to form polyploids. This allows the chromosomes from each parental species to form a matching pair during meiosis, as each parent's chromosomes is represented by a pair already.<ref>Belderok, Bob & Hans Mesdag & Dingena A. Donner. (2000) Bread-Making Quality of Wheat. Springer. p.3. ISBN 0-7923-6383-3.
*Hancock, James F. (2004) Planti Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species. CABI Publishing. ISBN 0-85199-685-X.</ref> An example of such a speciation event is when the plant species Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis arenosa cross-bred to give the new species Arabidopsis suecica.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> This happened about 20,000 years ago,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and the speciation process has been repeated in the laboratory, which allows the study of the genetic mechanisms involved in this process.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Indeed, chromosome doubling within a species may be a common cause of reproductive isolation, as half the doubled chromosomes will be unmatched when breeding with undoubled organisms.<ref name=Semon/>

www.blackwellpublishing.com/ridley/classictexts/eldredge.asp "Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism"] In T.J.M. Schopf, ed., Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman Cooper. pp. 82-115. Reprinted in N. Eldredge Time frames. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. 1985</ref> In this theory, speciation and rapid evolution are linked, with natural selection and genetic drift acting most strongly on organisms undergoing speciation in novel habitats or small populations. As a result, the periods of stasis in the fossil record correspond to the parental population, and the organisms undergoing speciation and rapid evolution are found in small populations or geographically-restricted habitats, and therefore rarely being preserved as fossils.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.blackwellpublishing.com/ridley/classictexts/eldredge.asp "Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism"] In T.J.M. Schopf, ed., Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman Cooper. pp. 82-115. Reprinted in N. Eldredge Time frames. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. 1985</ref> In this theory, speciation and rapid evolution are linked, with natural selection and genetic drift acting most strongly on organisms undergoing speciation in novel habitats or small populations. As a result, the periods of stasis in the fossil record correspond to the parental population, and the organisms undergoing speciation and rapid evolution are found in small populations or geographically-restricted habitats, and therefore rarely being preserved as fossils.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Extinction

Modèle:Details more

www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/91/15/6758.pdf |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=91 |issue=15 |pages=6758–63 |year=1994 |pmid=8041694}}</ref> The Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event, during which the dinosaurs went extinct, is the most well-known, but the earlier Permian-Triassic extinction event was even more severe, with approximately 96 percent of species driven to extinction.<ref name=Raup/> The Holocene extinction event is an ongoing mass extinction associated with humanity's expansion across the globe over the past few thousand years. Present-day extinction rates are 100-1000 times greater than the background rate, and up to 30 percent of species may be extinct by the mid 21st century.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Human activities are now the primary cause of the ongoing extinction event;<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> global warming may further accelerate it in the future.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/91/15/6758.pdf |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=91 |issue=15 |pages=6758–63 |year=1994 |pmid=8041694}}</ref> The Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event, during which the dinosaurs went extinct, is the most well-known, but the earlier Permian-Triassic extinction event was even more severe, with approximately 96 percent of species driven to extinction.<ref name=Raup/> The Holocene extinction event is an ongoing mass extinction associated with humanity's expansion across the globe over the past few thousand years. Present-day extinction rates are 100-1000 times greater than the background rate, and up to 30 percent of species may be extinct by the mid 21st century.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Human activities are now the primary cause of the ongoing extinction event;<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> global warming may further accelerate it in the future.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

The role of extinction in evolution depends on which type is considered. The causes of the continuous "low-level" extinction events, which form the majority of extinctions, are not well understood and may be the result of competition between species for shared resources.<ref name=Kutschera/> If competition from other species does alter the probability that a species will become extinct, this could produce species selection as a level of natural selection.<ref name=Gould/> The intermittent mass extinctions are also important, but instead of acting as a selective force, they drastically reduce diversity in a nonspecific manner and promote bursts of rapid evolution and speciation in survivors.<ref name=Raup/>

Evolutionary history of life

Main article: Evolutionary history of life

Origin of life

Modèle:Details more www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB090.html |accessdate=2007-05-13}}</ref> The current scientific consensus is that the complex biochemistry that makes up life came from simpler chemical reactions, but it is unclear how this occurred.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Not much is certain about the earliest developments in life, the structure of the first living things, or the identity and nature of any last universal common ancestor or ancestral gene pool.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journalModèle:Cite journal</ref> Consequently, there is no scientific consensus on how life began, but proposals include self-replicating molecules such as RNA,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and the assembly of simple cells.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB090.html |accessdate=2007-05-13}}</ref> The current scientific consensus is that the complex biochemistry that makes up life came from simpler chemical reactions, but it is unclear how this occurred.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Not much is certain about the earliest developments in life, the structure of the first living things, or the identity and nature of any last universal common ancestor or ancestral gene pool.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journalModèle:Cite journal</ref> Consequently, there is no scientific consensus on how life began, but proposals include self-replicating molecules such as RNA,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and the assembly of simple cells.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Common descent

Modèle:Details more

All organisms on Earth are descended from a common ancestor or ancestral gene pool.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Current species are a stage in the process of evolution, with their diversity the product of a long series of speciation and extinction events.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> The common descent of organisms was first deduced from four simple facts about organisms: First, they have geographic distributions that cannot be explained by local adaptation. Second, the diversity of life is not a set of completely unique organisms, but organisms that share morphological similarities. Third, vestigial traits with no clear purpose resemble functional ancestral traits, and finally, that organisms can be classified using these similarities into a hierarchy of nested groups.<ref name=Darwin/>

Past species have also left records of their evolutionary history. Fossils, along with the comparative anatomy of present-day organisms, constitute the morphological, or anatomical, record.<ref name=Jablonski>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> By comparing the anatomies of both modern and extinct species, paleontologists can infer the lineages of those species. However, this approach is most successful for organisms that had hard body parts, such as shells, bones or teeth. Further, as prokaryotes such as bacteria and archaea share a limited set of common morphologies, their fossils do not provide information on their ancestry.

More recently, evidence for common descent has come from the study of biochemical similarities between organisms. For example, all living cells use the same nucleic acids and amino acids.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> The development of molecular genetics has revealed the record of evolution left in organisms' genomes: dating when species diverged through the molecular clock produced by mutations.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> For example, these DNA sequence comparisons have revealed the close genetic similarity between humans and chimpanzees and shed light on when the common ancestor of these species existed.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Evolution of life

Modèle:Details

www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/0164755512w92302/fulltext.pdf |journal=Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci |volume=361 |issue=1470 |pages=969–1006 |year=2006 |pmid=16754610}}</ref> approximately 3–4 billion years ago.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> No obvious changes in morphology or cellular organization occurred in these organisms over the next few billion years.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/0164755512w92302/fulltext.pdf |journal=Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci |volume=361 |issue=1470 |pages=969–1006 |year=2006 |pmid=16754610}}</ref> approximately 3–4 billion years ago.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> No obvious changes in morphology or cellular organization occurred in these organisms over the next few billion years.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

The eukaryotes were the next major innovation in evolution. These came from ancient bacteria being engulfed by the ancestors of eukaryotic cells, in a cooperative association called endosymbiosis.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref><ref name=Dyall>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> The engulfed bacteria and the host cell then underwent co-evolution, with the bacteria evolving into either mitochondria or hydrogenosomes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> An independent second engulfment of cyanobacterial-like organisms led to the formation of chloroplasts in algae and plants.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

The history of life was that of the unicellular eukaryotes, prokaryotes, and archaea until about a billion years ago when multicellular organisms began to appear in the oceans in the Ediacaran period.<ref name=Cavalier-Smith/><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> The evolution of multicellularity occurred in multiple independent events, in organisms as diverse as sponges, brown algae, cyanobacteria, slime moulds and myxobacteria.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

dev.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/126/5/851 |journal=Development |volume=126 |issue=5 |pages=851–9 |year=1999 |pmid=9927587}}</ref> Various triggers for the Cambrian explosion have been proposed, including the accumulation of oxygen in the atmosphere from photosynthesis.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> About 500 million years ago, plants and fungi colonized the land, and were soon followed by arthropods and other animals.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Amphibians first appeared around 300 million years ago, followed by early amniotes, then mammals around 200 million years ago and birds around 100 million years ago (both from "reptile"-like lineages). However, despite the evolution of these large animals, smaller organisms similar to the types that evolved early in this process continue to be highly successful and dominate the Earth, with the majority of both biomass and species being prokaryotes.<ref name=Schloss/>//dev.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/126/5/851 |journal=Development |volume=126 |issue=5 |pages=851–9 |year=1999 |pmid=9927587}}</ref> Various triggers for the Cambrian explosion have been proposed, including the accumulation of oxygen in the atmosphere from photosynthesis.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref> About 500 million years ago, plants and fungi colonized the land, and were soon followed by arthropods and other animals.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Amphibians first appeared around 300 million years ago, followed by early amniotes, then mammals around 200 million years ago and birds around 100 million years ago (both from "reptile"-like lineages). However, despite the evolution of these large animals, smaller organisms similar to the types that evolved early in this process continue to be highly successful and dominate the Earth, with the majority of both biomass and species being prokaryotes.<ref name=Schloss/>

History of evolutionary thought

Modèle:Details

darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F350&viewtype=text&pageseq=1|title=On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties, and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection|journal=Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology|volume=3|date=1858|pages=53–62|accessdate=2007-05-13}}</ref> Shortly after, Darwin's publication of On the Origin of Species provided detailed support for the theory and led to increasingly wide acceptance of the occurrence of evolution.//darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F350&viewtype=text&pageseq=1|title=On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties, and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection|journal=Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology|volume=3|date=1858|pages=53–62|accessdate=2007-05-13}}</ref> Shortly after, Darwin's publication of On the Origin of Species provided detailed support for the theory and led to increasingly wide acceptance of the occurrence of evolution.

Nonetheless, Darwin's specific ideas about evolution, such as gradualism and the mechanisms of natural selection, were strongly contested at first. Lamarckists argued that transmutation of species occurred as parents passed on adaptations acquired during their lifetimes.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Eventually, when experiments failed to support it, this idea was abandoned in favor of Darwinism.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> More significantly, Darwin could not account for how traits were passed down from generation to generation. A mechanism was provided in 1865 by Gregor Mendel, who found that traits were inherited in a predictable manner.<ref name=Weiling>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> When Mendel's work was rediscovered in 1900, disagreements over the rate of evolution predicted by early geneticists and biometricians led to a rift between the Mendelian and Darwinian models of evolution.

This contradiction was reconciled in the 1930s by biologists such as Ronald Fisher. The end result was a combination of evolution by natural selection and Mendelian inheritance, the modern evolutionary synthesis.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> In the 1940s, the identification of DNA as the genetic material by Oswald Avery and colleagues and the subsequent publication of the structure of DNA by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953, demonstrated the physical basis for inheritance. Since then, genetics and molecular biology have become core parts of evolutionary biology and have revolutionized the field of phylogenetics.<ref name=Kutschera>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

In its early history, evolutionary biology primarily drew in scientists from traditional taxonomically-oriented disciplines, whose specialist training in particular organisms addressed general questions in evolution. As evolutionary biology expanded as an academic discipline, particularly after the development of the modern evolutionary synthesis, it began to draw more widely from the biological sciences.<ref name=Kutschera/> Currently the study of evolutionary biology involves scientists from fields as diverse as biochemistry, ecology, genetics and physiology, and evolutionary concepts are used in even more distant disciplines such as psychology, medicine, philosophy and computer science.

Social and cultural views

Modèle:Details more

www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/darwin/sect3.htm| accessdate =2007-05-24}}
*Modèle:Cite book
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/darwin/sect3.htm| accessdate =2007-05-24}}
*Modèle:Cite book
*Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/re1/chapter1.asp|title=Evolution & creation, science & religion, facts & bias|last=Sarfati|first=J|publisher=Answers in Genesis|accessdate=2007-04-16}}</ref> As Darwin recognized early on, the most controversial aspect of evolutionary thought is its implications for human origins. In some countries – notably the United States – these tensions between scientific and religious teachings have fueled the ongoing creation–evolution controversy, a religious conflict focusing on politics and public education.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> While other scientific fields such as cosmology<ref name="wmap">Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and earth science<ref name="zircon">Modèle:Cite journal</ref> also conflict with literal interpretations of many religious texts, evolutionary biology is strongly opposed by many religious believers.//www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/re1/chapter1.asp|title=Evolution & creation, science & religion, facts & bias|last=Sarfati|first=J|publisher=Answers in Genesis|accessdate=2007-04-16}}</ref> As Darwin recognized early on, the most controversial aspect of evolutionary thought is its implications for human origins. In some countries – notably the United States – these tensions between scientific and religious teachings have fueled the ongoing creation–evolution controversy, a religious conflict focusing on politics and public education.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> While other scientific fields such as cosmology<ref name="wmap">Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and earth science<ref name="zircon">Modèle:Cite journal</ref> also conflict with literal interpretations of many religious texts, evolutionary biology is strongly opposed by many religious believers.

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=10445929 |journal=BMJ |volume=319 |issue=7207 |pages=435–8 |year=1999 |pmid=10445929}}</ref> Another example of an extension of evolutionary theory that is now widely regarded as unwarranted is "Social Darwinism," a term given to the 19th century Whig Malthusian theory developed by Herbert Spencer into ideas about "survival of the fittest" in commerce and human societies as a whole, and by others into claims that social inequality, racism, and imperialism were justified.<ref>On the history of eugenics and evolution, see Modèle:Cite book</ref> However, contemporary scientists and philosophers consider these ideas to have been neither mandated by evolutionary theory nor supported by data.<ref>Darwin strongly disagreed with attempts by Herbert Spencer and others to extrapolate evolutionary ideas to all possible subjects; see Modèle:Cite book</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=10445929 |journal=BMJ |volume=319 |issue=7207 |pages=435–8 |year=1999 |pmid=10445929}}</ref> Another example of an extension of evolutionary theory that is now widely regarded as unwarranted is "Social Darwinism," a term given to the 19th century Whig Malthusian theory developed by Herbert Spencer into ideas about "survival of the fittest" in commerce and human societies as a whole, and by others into claims that social inequality, racism, and imperialism were justified.<ref>On the history of eugenics and evolution, see Modèle:Cite book</ref> However, contemporary scientists and philosophers consider these ideas to have been neither mandated by evolutionary theory nor supported by data.<ref>Darwin strongly disagreed with attempts by Herbert Spencer and others to extrapolate evolutionary ideas to all possible subjects; see Modèle:Cite book</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Applications in technology

Modèle:Details more

A major technological application of evolution is artificial selection, which is the intentional selection of certain traits in a population of organisms. Humans have used artificial selection for thousands of years in the domestication of plants and animals.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> More recently, such selection has become a vital part of genetic engineering, with selectable markers such as antibiotic resistance genes being used to manipulate DNA in molecular biology.

As evolution can produce highly optimized processes and networks, it has many applications in computer science. Here, simulations of evolution using evolutionary algorithms and artificial life started with the work of Nils Aall Barricelli in the 1960s, and was extended by Alex Fraser, who published a series of papers on simulation of artificial selection.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Artificial evolution became a widely recognized optimization method as a result of the work of Ingo Rechenberg in the 1960s and early 1970s, who used evolution strategies to solve complex engineering problems.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> Genetic algorithms in particular became popular through the writing of John Holland.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> As academic interest grew, dramatic increases in the power of computers allowed practical applications. Evolutionary algorithms are now used to solve multi-dimensional problems more efficiently than software produced by human designers, and also to optimize the design of systems.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Further reading

Introductory reading

• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book

History of evolutionary thought

• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book

Advanced reading

• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book

References

External links

Modèle:Spoken Wikipedia

Modèle:Wikibooks General information evolution.berkeley.edu/ Understanding Evolution from University of California, Berkeley]//evolution.berkeley.edu/ Understanding Evolution from University of California, Berkeley] evolution.berkeley.edu/ Understanding Evolution from University of California, Berkeley]//nationalacademies.org/evolution/ National Academies Evolution Resources] evolution.berkeley.edu/ Understanding Evolution from University of California, Berkeley]//www.newscientist.com/channel/life/evolution Everything you wanted to know about evolution by New Scientist] evolution.berkeley.edu/ Understanding Evolution from University of California, Berkeley]//science.howstuffworks.com/evolution.htm/printable Howstuffworks.com — How Evolution Works] evolution.berkeley.edu/ Understanding Evolution from University of California, Berkeley]//anthro.palomar.edu/synthetic/ Synthetic Theory Of Evolution: An Introduction to Modern Evolutionary Concepts and Theories]

History of evolutionary thought evolution.berkeley.edu/ Understanding Evolution from University of California, Berkeley]//darwin-online.org.uk The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online] evolution.berkeley.edu/ Understanding Evolution from University of California, Berkeley]//www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/understanding_evolution.htm Understanding Evolution: History, Theory, Evidence, and Implications]

Modèle:Portal Modèle:EvolutionModèle:Link FA Modèle:Link FA af:Evolusie ar:نظرية النشوء zh-min-nan:Chìn-hoà bg:Еволюция ca:Teoria de l'evolució cs:Evoluce cy:Esblygiad da:Evolution de:Evolution et:Evolutsioon el:Εξέλιξη (βιολογία) es:Evolución biológica eo:Evoluismo fa:فرگشت fr:Évolution (biologie) fy:Evolúsjeteory zh-classical:天演 ko:진화 id:Evolusi it:Evoluzione he:אבולוציה lv:Evolūcija lb:Evolutioun lt:Evoliucija hu:Evolúció mk:Еволуција nl:Evolutietheorie ja:進化 no:Evolusjon pl:Ewolucja biologiczna pt:Evolução ro:Teoria evoluţionistă ru:Эволюционное учение simple:Evolution sk:Evolúcia sl:Evolucija sr:Еволуција у биологији su:Évolusi fi:Evoluutio sv:Evolution th:วิวัฒนาการ tr:Evrim kuramı uk:Еволюція (біологія) yi:עוועלאציע zh:演化