Atheism

Un article de Vev.

Modèle:Semiprotected Modèle:Featured article Modèle:Redirect Modèle:Atheism2 Atheism, as a philosophical view, is the position that either affirms the nonexistence of gods<ref>Modèle:Cite encyclopedia</ref> or rejects theism.<ref>Modèle:Cite encyclopedia "...a more adequate characterization of atheism consists in the more complex claim that to be an atheist is to be someone who rejects belief in God for [reasons that depend] on how God is being conceived."</ref> When defined more broadly, atheism is the absence of belief in deities,<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> alternatively called nontheism.<ref>religioustolerance.org's short article on Definitions of the term "Atheism" suggests that there is no consensus on the definition of the term. Simon Blackburn summarizes the situation in The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy: "Atheism. Either the lack of belief in a god, or the belief that there is none." Most dictionaries (see the OneLook query for "atheism") first list one of the more narrow definitions.</ref> Although atheism is often equated with irreligion, some religious philosophies, such as secular theology and some varieties of Buddhism such as Theravada, either do not include belief in a personal god as a tenet of the religion, or actively teach nontheism.

Many self-described atheists are skeptical of all supernatural beings and cite a lack of empirical evidence for the existence of deities. Others argue for atheism on philosophical, social or historical grounds. Although many self-described atheists tend toward secular philosophies such as humanism<ref>Honderich, Ted (Ed.) (1995). "Humanism". The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. p 376. ISBN 0198661320.</ref> and naturalism,<ref>Fales, Evan. "Naturalism and Physicalism", in Modèle:Harvnb.</ref> there is no one ideology or set of behaviors to which all atheists adhere.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref>

The term atheism originated as a pejorative epithet applied to any person or belief in conflict with established religion.<ref name=drachmann>Modèle:Cite book</ref> With the spread of freethought, scientific skepticism, and criticism of religion, the term began to gather a more specific meaning and has been increasingly used as a self-description by atheists.

Etymology

In early Ancient Greek, the adjective Modèle:Transl (ἄθεος, from the privative ἀ- + θεός "god") meant "godless". The word began to indicate more-intentional, active godlessness in the 5th century BCE, acquiring definitions of "severing relations with the gods" or "denying the gods, ungodly" instead of the earlier meaning of ἀσεβής (Modèle:Transl) or "impious". Modern translations of classical texts sometimes render Modèle:Transl as "atheistic". As an abstract noun, there was also ἀθεότης (Modèle:Transl), "atheism". Cicero transliterated the Greek word into the Latin atheos. The term found frequent use in the debate between early Christians and pagans, with each side attributing it, in the pejorative sense, to the other.<ref name=drachmann/>

In English, the term atheism was derived from the French athéisme in about 1587.<ref>Rendered as Athisme: Modèle:Cite book Translation of De la verite de la religion chrestienne (1581). </ref> The term atheist (from Fr. athée), in the sense of "one who denies or disbelieves the existence of God",<ref>Modèle:OED</ref> predates atheism in English, being first attested in about 1571.<ref>Rendered as Atheistes: Modèle:Cite book Translated from French.</ref> Atheist as a label of practical godlessness was used at least as early as 1577.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> Related words emerged later: deist in 1621,<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> theist in 1662;<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> theism in 1678;<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> and deism in 1682.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> Deism and theism changed meanings slightly around 1700, due to the influence of atheism; deism was originally used as a synonym for today's theism, but came to denote a separate philosophical doctrine.<ref>The Oxford English Dictionary also records an earlier, irregular formation, atheonism, dated from about 1534. The later and now obsolete words athean and atheal are dated to 1611 and 1612 respectively. Modèle:Cite book</ref>

Karen Armstrong writes that "During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the word 'atheist' was still reserved exclusively for polemic ... The term 'atheist' was an insult. Nobody would have dreamed of calling himself an atheist."<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> Atheism was first used to describe a self-avowed belief in late 18th-century Europe, specifically denoting disbelief in the monotheistic Judeo-Christian god.<ref name="adevism">In part because of its wide use in monotheistic Western society, atheism is usually described as "disbelief in God", rather than more generally as "disbelief in deities". A clear distinction is rarely drawn in modern writings between these two definitions, but some archaic uses of atheism encompassed only disbelief in the singular God, not in polytheistic deities. It is on this basis that the obsolete term adevism was coined in the late 19th century to describe an absence of belief in plural deities. Modèle:Cite journal</ref> In the 20th century, globalization contributed to the expansion of the term to refer to disbelief in all deities, though it remains common in Western society to describe atheism as simply "disbelief in God"<ref name="martin">Martin, Michael. The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge University Press. 2006. ISBN 0521842700.</ref>. Most recently, there has been a push in certain philosophical circles to redefine atheism negatively, as the "absence of belief in deities", rather than as a belief in its own right; this definition has become popular in atheist communities, though its mainstream usage has been limited.<ref name="martin"/><ref> Cline , Austin

       (2006)
     
   
 
.    What Is the Definition of Atheism? 
. about.com 
   

. Retrieved on 2006-10-21. </ref><ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref>

Definitions and distinctions

Writers have disagreed on how best to define and classify atheism,<ref name="eb911-atheism"> "Atheism"

. Encyclopedia Britannica
 (1911)
   

. Retrieved on 2007-06-07. </ref> contesting what supernatural entities it applies to, whether it is an assertion in its own right or merely the absence of one, and whether it requires a conscious, explicit rejection. A variety of categories have been proposed to try to distinguish the different forms of atheism, most of which treat atheism as "absence of belief in deities" in order to explore the varieties of this nontheism.

Range

Some of the ambiguity and controversy involved in defining atheism arises from difficulty in reaching a consensus for the definitions of words like deity and god. The plurality of wildly different conceptions of god and deities leads to differing ideas regarding atheism's applicability. In contexts where theism is defined as the belief in a singular personal god, for example, people who believe in a variety of other deities may be classified as atheists, including deists and even polytheists. In the 20th century, this view has fallen into disfavor as theism has come to be understood as encompassing belief in any divinity.<ref name="mmartin">Martin, Michael. The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge University Press. 2006. ISBN 0521842700.</ref>

With respect to the range of phenomena being rejected, atheism may counter anything from the existence of a god, to the existence of any spiritual, supernatural, or transcendental concepts, such as those of Hinduism and Buddhism.<ref name="Britannica1992">Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Implicit vs. explicit

Main article: Implicit and explicit atheism

Definitions of atheism also vary in the degree of consideration a person must put to the idea of gods to be considered an atheist. Minimally, atheism may be seen as the absence of belief in one or more gods. It has been contended that this broad definition includes newborns and other people who have not been exposed to theistic ideas. As far back as 1772, d'Holbach said that "All children are born Atheists; they have no idea of God".<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> Similarly, George H. Smith (1979) suggested that: "The man who is unacquainted with theism is an atheist because he does not believe in a god. This category would also include the child with the conceptual capacity to grasp the issues involved, but who is still unaware of those issues. The fact that this child does not believe in god qualifies him as an atheist."<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref> Smith coined the term implicit atheism to refer to "the absence of theistic belief without a conscious rejection of it" and explicit atheism to refer to the more common definition of conscious disbelief.

The view that children are born atheist is relatively recent. Prior to the 18th century, the existence of God was so universally accepted in the western world that even the possibility of true atheism was questioned. This is called theistic innatism—the notion that all people believe in God from birth; within this view was the connotation that atheists are simply in denial.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> It is also asserted that atheists are quick to believe in God in times of crisis—that atheists make deathbed conversions, or that "there are no atheists in foxholes." Atheists dispute this claim by citing examples of "atheists in foxholes";<ref> Lowder , Jeffery Jay

       (1997)
     
   
 
.    Atheism and Society 

. Retrieved on 2007-01-10. </ref> also, atheist organizations of military personnel have been created in response.<ref>Two such organizations are Atheists in Foxholes and the Military Association of Atheists & Freethinkers.</ref>

Strong vs. weak

Main article: Weak and strong atheism

Philosophers such as Antony Flew<ref name="presumption">Flew, Antony. "The Presumption of Atheism". The Presumption of Atheism and other Philosophical Essays on God, Freedom, and Immortality. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1976. pp 14ff.</ref> and Michael Martin<ref name="martin"/> have contrasted strong (positive) atheism with weak (negative) atheism. Strong atheism is the explicit affirmation that gods do not exist. Weak atheism includes all other forms of non-theism. According to this categorization, anyone who is not a theist is either a weak or a strong atheist.<ref> Cline , Austin

       (2006)
     
   
 
.    Strong Atheism vs. Weak Atheism: What's the Difference? 
. about.com 
   

. Retrieved on 2006-10-21. </ref> The terms weak and strong are relatively recent; however, the equivalent terms negative and positive atheism have been used in the philosophical literature<ref name="presumption"/> and (in a slightly different sense) in Catholic apologetics.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Under this demarcation of atheism, most agnostics qualify as weak atheists.

While agnosticism can be seen as a form of weak atheism,<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> most agnostics see their view as distinct from atheism, which they may consider no more justified than theism, or requires an equal conviction.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> The supposed unattainability of knowledge for or against the existence of gods is sometimes seen as indication that atheism requires a leap of faith.<ref> Freking , Ken

  . 
 "
   Atheists take bigger leap of faith than ‘believers’ 
     
 " , Columbia Daily Tribune , 2005-01-23
 
  . Retrieved on 2007-05-30
 . </ref> Common atheist responses to this argument include that unproven religious propositions deserve as much disbelief as all other unproven propositions,<ref>Modèle:Harvnb. "Who seriously claims we should say 'I neither believe nor disbelieve that the Pope is a robot', or 'As to whether or not eating this piece of chocolate will turn me into an elephant I am completely agnostic'. In the absence of any good reasons to believe these outlandish claims, we rightly disbelieve them, we don't just suspend judgement."</ref> and that the unprovability of a god's existence does not imply equal probability of either possibility.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb. "A lack of proof is no grounds for the suspension of belief. This is because when we have a lack of absolute proof we can still have overwhelming evidence or one explanation which is far superior to the alternatives."</ref> Scottish philosopher J. J. C. Smart even argues that "sometimes a person who is really an atheist may describe herself, even passionately, as an agnostic because of unreasonable generalised philosophical scepticism which would preclude us from saying that we know anything whatever, except perhaps the truths of mathematics and formal logic."<ref name="stanford">   Smart , J.C.C. 
     
 

     (2004-03-09)
   
.    Atheism and Agnosticism 
. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 
   

. Retrieved on 2007-04-12. </ref> Consequently, some popular atheist authors such as Richard Dawkins prefer distinguishing theist, agnostic and atheist positions by the probability assigned to the statement "God exists".<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref>

Rationale

The broadest demarcation with respect to atheistic rationale is between practical and theoretical atheism. The different forms of theoretical atheism each derive from a particular rationale or philosophical argument. In contrast, practical atheism requires no specific argument, and can include indifference to and ignorance of the idea of gods.

Practical atheism

In practical, or pragmatic, atheism, also known as apatheism, individuals live as if there are no gods and explain natural phenomena without resorting to the divine. The existence of gods is not denied, but may be designated unnecessary or useless; gods neither provide purpose to life, nor influence everyday life, according to this view.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref> A form of practical atheism with implications for the scientific community is methodological naturalism—the "tacit adoption or assumption of philosophical naturalism within scientific method with or without fully accepting or believing it."<ref name="neps">Schafersman, Steven D. "Naturalism is an Essential Part of Science and Critical Inquiry". Conference on Naturalism, Theism and the Scientific Enterprise. Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas. February 1997. Revised May 2007. Retrieved on 2007-04-09.</ref>

Practical atheism can take various forms:

• Absence of religious motivation—belief in gods does not motivate moral action, religious action, or any other form of action;
• Active exclusion of the problem of gods and religion from intellectual pursuit and practical action;
• Indifference—the absence of any interest in the problems of gods and religion; or
• Ignorance—lacking any idea of gods.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref>

Historically, practical atheism has been associated with moral failure, willful ignorance and impiety. Those considered practical atheists were said to behave as though God, ethics and social responsibility did not exist; they abandoned duty and embraced hedonism. According to the French Catholic philosopher Étienne Borne, "Practical atheism is not the denial of the existence of God, but complete godlessness of action; it is a moral evil, implying not the denial of the absolute validity of the moral law but simply rebellion against that law."<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref>

Theoretical atheism

Modèle:Further

Theoretical, or contemplative, atheism explicitly posits arguments against the existence of gods, responding to common theistic arguments such as the argument from design or Pascal's Wager. The theoretical reasons for rejecting gods assume various psychological, sociological, metaphysical, and epistemological forms.

Epistemological arguments

Modèle:Further Epistemological atheism argues that people cannot know God or determine the existence of God. The foundation of epistemological atheism is agnosticism, which takes a variety of forms. In the philosophy of immanence, divinity is inseparable from the world itself, including a person's mind, and each person's consciousness is locked in the subject. According to this form of agnosticism, this limitation in perspective prevents any objective inference from belief in a god to assertions of its existence. The rationalistic agnosticism of Kant and the Enlightenment only accepts knowledge deduced with human rationality; this form of atheism holds that gods are not discernible as a matter of principle, and therefore cannot be known to exist. Skepticism, based on the ideas of Hume, asserts that certainty about anything is impossible, so one can never know the existence of God. The allocation of agnosticism to atheism is disputed; it can also be regarded as an independent, basic world-view.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref>

Other forms of atheistic argumentation that may qualify as epistemological, including logical positivism and ignosticism, assert the meaninglessness or unintelligibility of basic terms such as "God" and statements such as "God is all-powerful". Theological noncognitivism holds that the statement "God exists" does not express a proposition, but is nonsensical or cognitively meaningless. It has been argued both ways as to whether such individuals classify into some form of atheism or agnosticism. Philosophers A. J. Ayer and Theodore M. Drange reject both categories, stating that both camps accept "God exists" as a proposition; they instead place noncognitivism in its own category.<ref>Drange, Theodore M. (199Image:Cool.gif. "Atheism, Agnosticism, Noncognitivism". Internet Infidels, Secular Web Library. Retrieved on 2007-04-07.</ref><ref>Ayer, A. J. (1946). Language, Truth and Logic. Dover. pp. 115–116. In a footnote, Ayer attributes this view to "Professor H. H. Price".</ref>

Metaphysical arguments

Modèle:Further Metaphysical atheism is based on metaphysical monism—the view that reality is homogeneous and indivisible. Absolute metaphysical atheists subscribe to some form of physicalism, hence they explicitly deny the existence of non-physical beings. Relative metaphysical atheists maintain an implicit denial of a particular concept of God based on the incongruity between their individual philosophies and attributes commonly applied to God, such as transcendence, a personal aspect, or unity. Examples of relative metaphysical atheism include pantheism, panentheism, and deism.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref>

Psychological, sociological and economical arguments

Modèle:Further Philosophers such as Ludwig Feuerbach and Sigmund Freud argued that God and other religious beliefs are human inventions, created to fulfill various psychological and emotional wants or needs. This is also the Buddhist view.<ref>Walpola Rahula, What the Buddha Taught. Grove Press, 1974. Pages 51–52.</ref> Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, influenced by the work of Feuerbach, argued that belief in God and religion are social functions, used by those in power to oppress the working class. According to Mikhail Bakunin, "the idea of God implies the abdication of human reason and justice; it is the most decisive negation of human liberty, and necessarily ends in the enslavement of mankind, in theory and practice." He reversed Voltaire's famous aphorism that if God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him, writing instead that "if God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish Him."<ref>Bakunin, Michael (1916). God and the State. New York: Mother Earth Publishing Association. Retrieved on 2007-04-12.</ref>

Logical and evidential arguments

Modèle:Further Logical atheism holds that the various conceptions of gods, such as the personal god of Christianity, are ascribed logically inconsistent qualities. Such atheists present deductive arguments against the existence of God, which assert the incompatibility between certain traits, such as perfection, creator-status, immutability, omniscience, omnipresence, omnibenevolence, transcendence, personhood (a personal being), nonphysicality, justice and mercy.<ref>Various authors. "Logical Arguments for Atheism". Internet Infidels, The Secular Web Library. Retrieved on 2007-04-09.</ref>

Theodicean atheists believe that the world as they experience it cannot be reconciled with the qualities commonly ascribed to God and gods by theologians. They argue that an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent God is not compatible with a world where there is evil and suffering, and where divine love is hidden from many people.<ref>Drange, Theodore M. (1996). "The Arguments From Evil and Nonbelief". Internet Infidels, Secular Web Library. Retrieved 2007-04-18.</ref> A similar argument is attributed to Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism.<ref>V.A. Gunasekara, The Buddhist Attitude to God. In the Bhuridatta Jataka, "The Buddha argues that the three most commonly given attributes of God, viz. omnipotence, omniscience and benevolence towards humanity cannot all be mutually compatible with the existential fact of dukkha."</ref>

Anthropocentric arguments

Modèle:Further Axiological, or constructive, atheism rejects the existence of gods in favor of a "higher absolute", such as humanity. This form of atheism favors humanity as the absolute source of ethics and values, and permits individuals to resolve moral problems without resorting to God. Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and Sartre all used this argument to convey messages of liberation, full-development, and unfettered happiness.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref>

One of the most common criticisms of atheism has been to the contrary—that denying the existence of a just God leads to moral relativism, leaving one with no moral or ethical foundation,<ref name="misconceptions"> Gleeson , David

       (2006)
     
   
 
.    Common Misconceptions About Atheists and Atheism 
. American Chronicle 
   

. Retrieved on 2006-10-21. </ref> or renders life meaningless and miserable.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb. "Perhaps the most common criticism of atheism is the claim that it leads inevitably to moral bankruptcy."</ref> Blaise Pascal argued this view in 1669.<ref>Pascal, Blaise (1669). Pensées, II: "The Misery of Man Without God".</ref>

History

Main article: History of atheism

Although the term atheism originated in 16th-century France, ideas that would be recognized today as atheistic are documented from classical antiquity and the Vedic period.

Early Indic religion

Main article: Atheism in Hinduism

Atheistic schools are found in Hinduism, which is otherwise a very theistic religion. The thoroughly materialistic and anti-religious philosophical Cārvāka School that originated in India around 6th century BCE is probably the most explicitly atheistic school of philosophy in India. This branch of Indian philosophy is classified as a heterodox system and is not considered part of the six orthodox schools of Hinduism, but it is noteworthy as evidence of a materialistic movement within Hinduism.<ref>Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Charles A. Moore. A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy. (Princeton University Press: 1957, Twelfth Princeton Paperback printing 1989) pp. 227–249. ISBN 0-691-01958-4.</ref> Chatterjee and Datta explain that our understanding of Cārvāka philosophy is fragmentary, based largely on criticism of the ideas by other schools, and that it is not a living tradition:

"Though materialism in some form or other has always been present in India, and occasional references are found in the Vedas, the Buddhistic literature, the Epics, as well as in the later philosophical works we do not find any systematic work on materialism, nor any organised school of followers as the other philosophical schools possess. But almost every work of the other schools states, for reputation, the materialistic views. Our knowledge of Indian materialism is chiefly based on these."<ref>Satischandra Chatterjee and Dhirendramohan Datta. An Introduction to Indian Philosophy. Eighth Reprint Edition. (University of Calcutta: 1984). p. 55.</ref>

Other Indian philosophies generally regarded as atheistic include Classical Samkhya and Purva Mimamsa. The rejection of a personal creator God is also seen in Jainism and Buddhism in India.<ref name="Joshi">Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Classical antiquity

Western atheism has its roots in pre-Socratic Greek philosophy, but did not emerge as a distinct world-view until the late Enlightenment.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb. "Atheism had its origins in Ancient Greece but did not emerge as an overt and avowed belief system until late in the Enlightenment."</ref> The 5th-century BCE Greek philosopher Diagoras is known as the "first atheist",<ref>Solmsen, Friedrich (1942). Plato's Theology. Cornell University Press. p 25.</ref> and strongly criticized religion and mysticism. Critias viewed religion as a human invention used to frighten people into following moral order.<ref>"religion, study of". (2007). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved on April 2, 2007.</ref> Atomists such as Democritus attempted to explain the world in a purely materialistic way, without reference to the spiritual or mystical. Other pre-Socratic philosophers who probably had atheistic views included Prodicus, Protagoras, and Theodorus.

Socrates was accused of being an atheist for impiety (see Euthyphro dilemma) on the basis that he inspired questioning of the state gods.<ref> Atheism

. The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition
. Columbia University Press 
 
   (2005)
     
   
 

. Retrieved on 2007-04-12. </ref> Although he disputed the accusation that he was a "complete atheist",<ref>Modèle:Cite book In particular, he argues that the claim he is a complete atheist contradicts the other part of the indictment, that he introduced "new divinities".</ref> he was ultimately sentenced to death.

Another atomic materialist, Epicurus, disputed many religious doctrines, including the existence of an afterlife or a personal deity; he considered the soul purely material and mortal. While Epicureanism did not rule out the existence of gods, he believed that if they did exist, they were unconcerned with humanity.<ref name="BBC"> BBC

.    Ethics and Religion—Atheism 
. bbc.co.uk 
   

. Retrieved on 2007-04-12. </ref>

The Roman poet Lucretius agreed that, if there were gods, they were unconcerned with humanity and unable to affect the natural world. For this reason, he believed humanity should have no fear of the supernatural. In De rerum natura ("On the nature of things"), he expounds his Epicurean views of the cosmos, atoms, the soul, mortality, and religion.<ref>Modèle:Gutenberg Book I, "Substance is Eternal". Translated by W.E. Leonard. 1997. Retrieved on 2007-04-12.</ref>

The Roman philosopher Sextus Empiricus held that one should suspend judgment about virtually all beliefs—a form of skepticism known as Pyrrhonism—that nothing was inherently evil, and that ataraxia ("peace of mind") is attainable by withholding one's judgment. His relatively large volume of surviving works had a lasting influence on later philosophers.<ref name="gordonstein">Stein, Gordon (Ed.) (1980). "The History of Freethought and Atheism". An Anthology of Atheism and Rationalism. New York: Prometheus. Retrieved on 2007-04-03.</ref>

The meaning of "atheist" changed over the course of classical antiquity. The early Christians were labeled atheists by non-Christians because of their disbelief in pagan gods.<ref name="cathencyc-atheism">Modèle:Ws</ref> During the Roman Empire, Christians were executed for their rejection of the Roman gods in general and Emperor-worship in particular. When Christianity became the state religion of Rome under Theodosius I in 381, heresy became a punishable offense.<ref>Maycock, A. L. and Ronald Knox (2003). Inquisition from Its Establishment to the Great Schism: An Introductory Study. ISBN 0766172902.</ref>

Early Middle Ages to the Renaissance

The espousal of atheistic views was rare in Europe during the Early Middle Ages and Middle Ages (see Medieval Inquisition); metaphysics, religion and theology were the dominant interests.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb</ref> There were, however, movements within this period that forwarded heterodox conceptions of the Christian God, including differing views of the nature, transcendence, and knowability of God. Individuals and groups such as Johannes Scotus Eriugena, David of Dinant, Amalric of Bena, and the Brethren of the Free Spirit maintained Christian viewpoints with pantheistic tendencies. Nicholas of Cusa held to a form of fideism he called docta ignorantia ("learned ignorance"), asserting that God is beyond human categorization, and our knowledge of God is limited to conjecture. William of Ockham inspired anti-metaphysical tendencies with his nominalistic limitation of human knowledge to singular objects, and asserted that the divine essence could not be intuitively or rationally apprehended by human intellect. Followers of Ockham, such as John of Mirecourt and Nicholas of Autrecourt furthered this view. The resulting division between faith and reason influenced later theologians such as John Wycliffe, Jan Hus, and Martin Luther.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref>

The Renaissance did much to expand the scope of freethought and skeptical inquiry. Individuals such as Leonardo da Vinci sought experimentation as a means of explanation, and opposed arguments from religious authority. Other critics of religion and the Church during this time included Niccolò Machiavelli, Bonaventure des Périers, and François Rabelais.<ref name="gordonstein"/>

Early Modern Period

The Renaissance and Reformation eras witnessed a resurgence in religious fervor, as evidenced by the proliferation of new religious orders, confraternities, and popular devotions in the Catholic world, and the appearance of increasingly austere Protestant sects such as the Calvinists. This era of interconfessional rivalry permitted an even wider scope of theological and philosophical speculation, much of which would later be used to advance a religiously skeptical world-view.

Criticism of Christianity became increasingly frequent in the 17th and 18th centuries, especially in France and England, where there appears to have been a religious malaise, according to contemporary sources. Some Protestant thinkers, such as Thomas Hobbes, espoused a materialist philosophy and skepticism toward supernatural occurrences. In the late 17th century, Deism came to be openly espoused by intellectuals such as John Toland, and practically all the philosophes of 18th-century France and England held to some form of Deism. Despite their ridicule of Christianity, many Deists held atheism in scorn. The first known atheist who threw off the mantle of deism, bluntly denying the existence of gods, was Jean Meslier, a French priest that lived in the early 18th century.<ref>Michel Onfray on Jean Meslier:http://www.wpunj.edu/newpol/issue40/Onfray40.htm</ref> He was followed by other openly atheistic thinkers, such as Baron d'Holbach, who appeared in the late 18th century, when expressing disbelief in God became a less dangerous position.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> David Hume was the most systematic exponent of Enlightenment thought, developing a skeptical epistemology grounded in empiricism, undermining the metaphysical basis of natural theology.

The French Revolution took atheism outside the salons and into the public sphere. Attempts to enforce the Civil Constitution of the Clergy led to anti-clerical violence and the expulsion of many clergy from France. The chaotic political events in revolutionary Paris eventually enabled the more radical Jacobins to seize power in 1793, ushering in the Reign of Terror. At its climax, the more militant atheists attempted to forcibly de-Christianize France, replacing religion with a Cult of Reason. These persecutions ended with the Thermidorian Reaction, but some of the secularizing measures of this period remained a permanent legacy of French politics.

The Napoleonic era institutionalized the secularization of French society, and exported the revolution to northern Italy, in the hopes of creating pliable republics. In the nineteenth century, many atheists and other anti-religious thinkers devoted their efforts to political and social revolution, facilitating the upheavals of 1848, the Risorgimento in Italy, and the growth of an international socialist movement.

In the latter half of the 19th century, atheism rose to prominence under the influence of rationalistic and freethinking philosophers. Many prominent German philosophers of this era denied the existence of deities and were critical of religion, including Ludwig Feuerbach, Arthur Schopenhauer, Karl Marx, and Friedrich Nietzsche.<ref> Ray , Matthew Alun

     (2003)
   
.    Subjectivity and Irreligion: Atheism and Agnosticism in Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche 
. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. 
   

. Retrieved on 2007-04-12. </ref>

The 20th Century

Atheism in the 20th century, particularly in the form of practical atheism, advanced in many societies. Atheistic thought found recognition in a wide variety of other, broader philosophies, such as existentialism, Objectivism, secular humanism, nihilism, logical positivism, Marxism, feminism,<ref>Overall, Christine. "Feminism and Atheism", in Modèle:Harvnb.</ref> and the general scientific and rationalist movement.

Logical positivism and scientism paved the way for neopositivism, analytical philosophy, structuralism, and naturalism. Neopositivism and analytical philosophy discarded classical rationalism and metaphysics in favor of strict empiricism and epistemological nominalism. Proponents such as Bertrand Russell emphatically rejected belief in God. In his early work, Ludwig Wittgenstein attempted to separate metaphysical and supernatural language from rational discourse. A. J. Ayer asserted the unverifiability and meaninglessness of religious statements, citing his adherence to the empirical sciences. Relatedly the applied structuralism of Lévi-Strauss sourced religious language to the human subconscious in denying its transcendental meaning. J. N. Findlay and J. J. C. Smart argued that the existence of God is not logically necessary. Naturalists and materialistic monists such as John Dewey considered the natural world to be the basis of everything, denying the existence of God or immortality.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref><ref name="stanford"/>

The 20th century also saw the political advancement of atheism, spurred on by interpretation of the works of Marx and Engels. After the 1917 revolution in Russia, increased religious freedom for minority religions lasted for a few years, before the policies of Stalinism turned towards repression of religion. The Soviet Union and other communist states promoted state atheism and opposed religion, often by violent means.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> Other leaders like E. V. Ramasami Naicker (Periyar), a prominent atheist leader of India, fought against Hinduism and Brahmins for discriminating and dividing people in the name of caste and religion.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> This was highlighted in 1956 when he made the Hindu god Rama wear a garland made of slippers and made antitheistic statements.<ref>"He who created god was a fool, he who spreads his name is a scoundrel, and he who worships him is a barbarian." Hiorth, Finngeir (1996). "Atheism in South India". International Humanist and Ethical Union, International Humanist News. Retrieved on 2007-05-30.</ref>

In 1966, TIME magazine asked "Is God Dead?"<ref>TIME Magazine cover online. 8 Apr 1966. Retrieved 2007-04-17.</ref> in response to the Death of God theological movement, citing the estimation that nearly one in two people in the world lived under an anti-religious power and millions more in Africa, Asia, and South America seemed to lack knowledge of the Christian God.<ref>"Toward a Hidden God". TIME Magazine online. 8 Apr 1966. Retrieved 2007-04-17.</ref> The following year, the Albanian government under Enver Hoxha announced the closure of all religious institutions in the country, declaring Albania the world's first atheist state.<ref>Majeska, George P. (1976). "Religion and Atheism in the U.S.S.R. and Eastern Europe, Review". The Slavic and East European Journal. 20(2). pp. 204–206.</ref> These regimes enhanced the negative associations of atheism, especially where anti-communist sentiment was strong in the United States, despite the fact that some prominent atheists were anti-communist.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, the number of actively anti-religious regimes has reduced considerably. In 2006, Timothy Shah of the Pew Forum noted "a worldwide trend across all major religious groups, in which God-based and faith-based movements in general are experiencing increasing confidence and influence vis-à-vis secular movements and ideologies."<ref>"Timothy Samuel Shah Explains 'Why God is Winning'". 2006-07-18. The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. Retrieved 2007-04-18.</ref> Gregory S. Paul and Phil Zuckerman consider this a myth and suggest that the actual situation is more complex and nuanced.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

Demographics

Main article: Demographics of atheism

It is difficult to quantify the number of atheists in the world. Respondents to religious-belief polls may define "atheism" differently or draw different distinctions between atheism, non-religious beliefs, and non-theistic religious and spiritual beliefs. In addition, people in some regions of the world refrain from reporting themselves as atheists to avoid social stigma, discrimination, and persecution. A 2005 survey published in Encyclopædia Britannica found that the non-religious make up about 11.9% of the world's population, and atheists about 2.3%. This figure does not include those who follow atheistic religions, such as some Buddhists.<ref name="Britannica demographics"> Worldwide Adherents of All Religions by Six Continental Areas, Mid-2005

. Encyclopædia Britannica 
 
 (2005)
   

. Retrieved on 2007-04-15.

• 2.3% Atheists: Persons professing atheism, skepticism, disbelief, or irreligion, including the militantly antireligious (opposed to all religion).
• 11.9% Nonreligious: Persons professing no religion, nonbelievers, agnostics, freethinkers, uninterested, or dereligionized secularists indifferent to all religion but not militantly so.

</ref> A November–December 2006 poll published in the Financial Times gives rates for the United States and five European countries. It found that Americans are more likely than Europeans to believe in any form of god or supreme being (73%). Of the European adults surveyed, Italians are the most likely to express this belief (62%) and the French the least likely (27%). In France, 32% declared themselves atheists, and an additional 32% declared themselves agnostic.<ref> Religious Views and Beliefs Vary Greatly by Country, According to the Latest Financial Times/Harris Poll

. Financial Times/Harris Interactive 
 
 (2006-12-20)
   

. Retrieved on 2007-01-17. </ref> An official European Union survey provides corresponding figures: 18% of the EU population do not believe in a god; 27% accept the existence of some supernatural "spiritual life force", while 52% affirm belief in a specific god. The proportion of believers rises to 65% among those who had left school by the age of fifteen; survey respondents who considered themselves to be from a strict family background were more likely to believe in god than those who felt their upbringing lacked firm rules.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref>

A letter published in Nature in 1998 reported a survey suggesting that belief in a personal god or afterlife was at an all-time low among the members of the U.S. National Academy of Science, only 7.0% of whom believed in a personal god as compared to more than 85% of the general U.S. population.<ref>Modèle:Cite journal Available at StephenJayGould.org, Stephen Jay Gould archive. Retrieved on 2006-12-17</ref> In the same year Frank Sulloway of MIT and Michael Shermer of California State University conducted a study which found in their polling sample of "credentialed" U.S. adults (12% had Ph.Ds and 62% were college graduates) 64% believed in God, and there was a correlation indicating that religious conviction diminished with education level.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref> Such an inverse correlation between religiosity and intelligence has been found by 39 studies carried out between 1927 and 2002, according to an article in Mensa Magazine.<ref>According to Dawkins (2006), p. 103. Dawkins cites Bell, Paul. "Would you believe it?" Mensa Magazine, UK Edition, Feb. 2002, pp. 12–13. Analyzing 43 studies carried out since 1927, Bell found that all but four reported such a connection, and he concluded that "the higher one's intelligence or education level, the less one is likely to be religious or hold 'beliefs' of any kind."</ref> These findings broadly concur with a 1958 statistical meta-analysis from Professor Michael Argyle of Oxford University. He analyzed seven research studies that had investigated correlation between attitude to religion and measured intelligence among school and college students from the U.S. Although a clear negative correlation was found, the analysis did not identify causality but noted that factors such as authoritarian family background and social class may also have played a part.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref>

However, evidence on the relationship between religious belief and educational achievement is mixed. Some research in the United States has found that religious participation among religious people is correlated with greater educational attainment and scholastic performance. The effect of religion on education can differ depending on what type of religion a student professes. Fundamentalist Christians, especially women, tend to acquire fewer years of education than others do.<ref>Lehrer, E.L. (2004). "Religiosity as a Determinant of Educational Attainment." Review of Economics of the Household 2:205.</ref><ref>Sherkat, D.E. Religion and Higher Education: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Social Science Research Council: 6 Feb. 2006. Retrieved 16 June 2007.</ref>

Atheism, religion and morality

Main articles: Atheism and religion and Secular ethics

Although people who self-identify as atheists are usually assumed to be irreligious, some sects within major religions reject the existence of a personal, creator deity.<ref name="winston2">Modèle:Cite book</ref> In recent years, certain religious denominations have accumulated a number of openly atheistic followers, such as atheistic or humanistic Judaism<ref> Humanistic Judaism

. BBC 
 
 (2006-07-20)
   

. Retrieved on 2006-10-25. </ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref> and Christian atheists.<ref> Christian Atheism

. BBC 
 
 (2006-05-17)
   

. Retrieved on 2006-10-25. </ref><ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref><ref>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>

As the strictest sense of positive atheism does not entail any specific beliefs outside of disbelief in God, atheists can hold any number of spiritual beliefs. For the same reason, atheists can hold a wide variety of ethical beliefs, ranging from the moral universalism of humanism, which holds that a moral code should be applied consistently to all humans, to moral nihilism, which holds that morality is meaningless.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref>

In past centuries, a number of theologians and literary figures, and a small selection of ethicists, have equated atheism with immorality, making the theological argument that morality must be derived from God and cannot exist without a wise creator.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb. "Among the many myths associated with religion, none is more widespread—or more disastrous in its effects—than the myth that moral values cannot be divorced from the belief in a god."</ref><ref>In Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov (Book Eleven: Brother Ivan Fyodorovich, Chapter 4) there is the famous argument that If there is no God, all things are permitted.: "'But what will become of men then?' I asked him, 'without God and immortal life? All things are lawful then, they can do what they like?'"</ref><ref name = "Kant CPR A811"> For Kant, the presupposition of God, soul, and freedom was a practical concern, for "Morality, by itself, constitutes a system, but happiness does not, unless it is distributed in exact proportion to morality. This, however, is possible in an intelligible world only under a wise author and ruler. Reason compels us to admit such a ruler, together with life in such a world, which we must consider as future life, or else all moral laws are to be considered as idle dreams..." (Critique of Pure Reason, A811).</ref> Moral precepts such as "murder is wrong" are seen as divine laws, requiring a divine lawmaker and judge. However, many atheists argue that treating morality legalistically involves a false analogy, and that morality does not depend upon a lawmaker in the same way that laws do,<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref> based on the Euthyphro dilemma, which either renders God unnecessary or morality arbitrary.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref>

Philosophers Susan Neiman<ref>Modèle:Cite video</ref> and Julian Baggini<ref> Modèle:Harvnb</ref> (among others) assert that behaving ethically only because of divine mandate is not true ethical behavior but merely blind obedience. Baggini argues that atheism is a superior basis for ethics, claiming that a moral basis external to religious imperatives is necessary to evaluate the morality of the imperatives themselves—to be able to discern, for example, that "thou shalt steal" is immoral even if one's religion instructs it—and that atheists, therefore, have the advantage of being more inclined to make such evaluations.<ref>Modèle:Harvnb.</ref>

Atheists such as Sam Harris have argued that Western religions' reliance on divine authority lends itself to authoritarianism and dogmatism.<ref> Harris , Sam

       (2006a)
     
   
 
.    The Myth of Secular Moral Chaos 
. Free Inquiry 
   

. Retrieved on 2006-10-29. </ref> Indeed, religious fundamentalism and extrinsic religion (when religion is held because it serves other, more ultimate interests<ref name=Moreira-almeida2006>Modèle:Cite journal</ref>) have been correlated with authoritarianism, dogmatism, and prejudice.<ref>See for example: Kahoe, R.D. (June 1977). "Intrinsic Religion and Authoritarianism: A Differentiated Relationship". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 16(2). pp. 179–182. Also see: Altemeyer, Bob and Bruce Hunsberger (1992). "Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice". International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 2(2). pp. 113–133.</ref> This argument, combined with historical events that are argued to demonstrate the dangers of religion, such as the Crusades, inquisitions, and witch trials, are often used by antireligious atheists to justify their views.<ref> Harris , Sam

       (2005)
     
   
 
.    An Atheist Manifesto 
. Truthdig 
   

. Retrieved on 2006-10-29.

 “In a world riven by ignorance, only the atheist refuses to deny the obvious: Religious faith promotes human violence to an astonishing degree.”

</ref> Theists have made very similar arguments, however, against atheists based on the state atheism of communist states.<ref>Modèle:Cite book</ref>

See also

• List of atheists
• List of atheist organizations
• Discrimination against atheists

Further reading

• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Flynn, Tom, ed. (2007). The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1591023912.
• «  »
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Mackie, J. L. (1982). The Miracle of Theism: Arguments For and Against the Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford UP. ISBN 019824682X
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Martin, Michael, ed. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521603676
• Martin, Michael & Monnier, R., eds. (2003). The Impossibility of God. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. ISBN 1591021200
• Martin, Michael & Monnier, R., eds. (2006). The Improbability of God. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. ISBN 1591023815
• McTaggart, John & McTaggart, Ellis (1930). Some Dogmas of Religion. London: Edward Arnold & Co., new edition. [First published 1906] ISBN 0548149550
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Modèle:Cite book
• Smith, George Atheism: The Case Against God, (1974). ISBN 087975124X
• Stenger, Victor J. (2007). God: The Failed Hypothesis. How Science Shows that God Does Not Exist. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. ISBN 1591024811
• Modèle:Cite book

Notes and references

• «  »
• «  »
• «  »
• «  »

External links

Modèle:Sisterlinks

• [Atheism Catégorie Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Atheism/] de l’annuaire dmoz. - Includes links to organizations and websites.
• Freedom From Religion Foundation - Foundation dedicated to protecting the separation of church and state.
• Positive atheism: Great Historical Writings - Historical writing sorted by authors, contains a few items not in the Secular web library.
• Religion & Ethics—Atheism at bbc.co.uk.
• Secular Web library - Library of both historical and modern writings, a comprehensive online resource for freely available material on atheism.
• The Demand for Religion - A study on the demographics of Atheism by Wolfgang Jagodzinski (University of Cologne) and Andrew Greeley (University of Chicago and University of Arizona).
• The Necessity of Atheism - Complete work by Dr. D.M. Brooks.

Modèle:Atheism Modèle:Belief systems Modèle:Philosophy navigation Modèle:Religion-related topicsModèle:Link FA

af:Ateïsme ar:إلحاد an:Ateísmo az:Ateizm bn:নাস্তিকবাদ be-x-old:Атэізм bs:Ateizam br:Dizoueegezh bg:Атеизъм ca:Ateisme cs:Ateismus cy:Anffyddiaeth da:Ateisme de:Atheismus et:Ateism el:Αθεϊσμός es:Ateísmo eo:Ateismo eu:Ateismo fa:بی‌خدایی fr:Athéisme fur:Ateisim gd:Neo-dhiadhaireachd gl:Ateísmo ko:무신론 hi:नास्तिकता hr:Ateizam id:Ateisme ia:Atheismo is:Trúleysi it:Ateismo he:אתאיזם jv:Ateisme ka:ათეიზმი ht:Ateyis la:Atheismus lv:Ateisms lb:Atheismus lt:Ateizmas li:Atheïsme lmo:Ateismu hu:Ateizmus mk:Атеизам mt:Ateiżmu ms:Ateisme nl:Atheïsme ne:नास्तिकता ja:無神論 no:Ateisme nn:Ateisme oc:Ateïsme uz:Ateizm nds:Atheismus pl:Ateizm pt:Ateísmo ro:Ateism ru:Атеизм sco:Atheism sq:Ateizmi scn:Ateismu simple:Atheism sk:Ateizmus sl:Ateizem sr:Атеизам fi:Ateismi sv:Ateism te:నాస్తికులు vi:Thuyết vô thần tr:Ateizm uk:Атеїзм ur:دہریت yi:אטעאיזם zh:无神论